THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SIPKE WADMAN and KLAUS B. SCHILDBACH
_____________
Appeal No. 97-3669
Application 08/391,7451
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before LEE, TORCZON and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 2-6, 8-14, and 22-28.
Claims 1, 7, and 15-21 have been canceled.
References relied on by the Examiner
Kleiman 4,643,532 Feb. 17, 1987
Won 5,400,157 Mar. 21, 1995
Cornet 0,046,104 Feb. 17, 1982
(European Patent)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007