THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RICHARDO A. BLOCH, ARUNAS T. LAPINAS,
EDWARD F. OUTTEN, ANDREW J.D. RITCHIE and MALCOLM WADDOUPS
________________
Appeal No. 97-3776
Application No. 08/396,5011
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed March 7, 1995. According1
to appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 08/234,090, filed April 28, 1994, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007