Appeal No. 97-3776 Application No. 08/396,501 result, the examiner has not met her initial burden of setting forth a prima facie case of obviousness for the claimed subject matter. Also, the examiner's treatment of the Waddoups declaration at page 6 of the Answer is inadequate. The examiner provides no critical analysis of the declaration in support of her conclusion that the declaration results are "expected in the use of secondary zinc dihydrocarbyl dithiophosphates over primary zinc dihydrocarbyl dithiophosphates." We note that the lubricant offered for comparison in the declaration, ECA 14751, comprises 34 mole percent sec-hydrocarbyl groups. In conclusion, based on the present record, we are constrained to reverse the examiner's rejection. REVERSED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007