THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SCOTT H. PRENGLE and ROBERT H. EKLUND
____________
Appeal No. 1997-3967
Application No. 08/482,0581
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and KRASS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed June 7, 1995. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/165,553 filed December 10, 1993, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,910,676 issued June 8, 1999; which is a
continuation of Application No. 07/895,535 filed June 8, 1992,
now abandoned; which is a division of Application No.
07/785,174 filed October 29, 1991; now U.S. Patent No.
5,171,702 issued December 15, 1992; which is a continuation of
Application No. 07/383,960 filed July 21, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007