Ex parte PRENGLE et al. - Page 4




                 Appeal No. 1997-3967                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/482,058                                                                                                             


                 Schaber                                               4,752,589                                    Jun. 21,                            
                 1988                                                                                                                                   
                 Japanese Kokai Application                     2      62-98663                                     May   8,                            
                 1987                                                                                                                                   
                 (Denda)                                                                                                                                

                          Claims 25 through 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                                                                         
                 112, second paragraph, as being vague and indefinite.  Claims                                                                          
                 14, 16, 19 through 21, 23 and 26 through 28 stand rejected                                                                             
                 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the                                                                                
                 examiner offers Denda with regard to claims 14, 16, 19, 21,                                                                            
                 23, 26 and 28, adding Schaber with regard to claims 20 and 27.                                                                         
                          Reference is made to the brief and answer for the                                                                             
                 respective positions of appellants and the examiner.                                                                                   


                                                                     OPINION                                                                            
                          Turning first to the rejection of claims 25 through 27                                                                        
                 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, it is the examiner’s                                                                          
                 view that the claims are indefinite since claim 25 depends                                                                             



                          2Our understanding of Denda is based on an English                                                                            
                 translation thereof prepared for the United States Patent and                                                                          
                 Trademark Office.                                                                                                                      
                                                                           4                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007