Appeal No. 1997-4053
Application 08/548,714
With respect to claims 8 and 10, appellants premise
the patentability of these claims on the arguments tendered
with respect to claim 1. Here again, we reiterate our opinion
that
the subject matter of these claims is prima facie obvious in a
similar manner as to claim 1.
The rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5, 6, 8 and 10
has been affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
con- nection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR §
1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
WILLIAM F. PATE, III )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF
PATENT
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007