Ex parte SCHEIVE et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-4062                                         Page 3           
          Application No. 08/590,049                                                  


               Claim 1, which is representative for our purposes,                     
          follows:                                                                    
               1.   In a computer system including a central                          
               processing unit ("CPU") capable of issuing a signal                    
               to a memory to retrieve a requested instruction from                   
               said memory when said CPU is booted, a circuit,                        
               transparent to said CPU, capable of localizing                         
               faults within said computer system, comprising:                        
                    an interception and substitution circuit,                         
               coupled to said CPU, capable of intercepting said                      
               signal and providing an alternative instruction to                     
               said CPU in lieu of said requested instruction, said                   
               alternative instruction directing said CPU to                          
               perform a diagnostic check of said computer system,                    
               said CPU providing an indication of proper                             
               functioning of said computer system, said CPU                          
               requiring no hardware modifications to operate in                      
               conjunction with said interception and substitution                    
               circuit.                                                               

               The reference relied on in rejecting the claims follows:               
          Warchol                  5,327,435                     July 5,              
          1994.                                                                       


          Claims 1-33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious                 
          over Warchol.  Rather than repeat the arguments of the                      
          appellants or examiner in toto, we refer the reader to the                  
          brief and the answer for the respective details thereof.                    









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007