Ex parte SANDERS - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-4082                                                           
          Application 08/365,849                                                       


               The following rejections are before us for review.2                     





               Claims 1, 4, 7, 13, 17, 18, 23 through 25, and 28 through               
          35  stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable               
          over Goellner in view of Wexler.                                             


               Claim 36 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable over Goellner in view of Wexler, as applied to                  
          claim 18, further in view of Balousek.                                       


               Claims 5, 6, 15, 16, 21, 22, 26, and 27 stand rejected                  
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Goellner in                 
          view of Wexler, as applied to claims 1 and 18, further in view               
          of Rivers.                                                                   


               The full text of the examiner's rejections and response                 


               2A final rejection of claims 1, 4 through 7, 13, 15 through 18, and 21 through
          37 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, was overcome by an entered amendment, filed
          after the final rejection (Paper No. 9).                                     
                                          3                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007