Appeal No. 97-4212
Application No. 08/630,031
fact that such a teaching is lacking in both of the applied
references.
For the reasons expressed above, we conclude that the
combined teachings of Enomoto and Killea fail to establish a
prima facie case of obviousness with regard to the subject
matter recited in the claim, and it is on this basis that we
will not sustain the rejection.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007