Ex parte ROBERTSON et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-4224                                                        
          Application No. 08/474,866                                                  



               The examiner relies on the following reference:                        
          Schreiber                     4,503,429                     Mar.            
          5, 1985                                                                     


               Claims 25 through 27, 53, 54, 59 and 68 through 76 stand               
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Schreiber.              
               Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the                     
          respective positions of appellants and the examiner.                        


                                       OPINION                                        
               We reverse.                                                            
               It is the examiner’s duty, in the first instance, to                   
          establish a case of prima facie obviousness when applying a                 
          rejection based on 35 U.S.C. § 103.  In the instant case,                   
          while we do not determine that a prima facie case could not                 
          have been made in the instant case, based on the evidence                   
          provided by Schreiber, we merely conclude that the examiner                 
          simply has not done so.                                                     
               The independent claims each call for, in one form or                   
          another, a first and second computer.  The examiner has                     

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007