Appeal No. 98-0107 Page 3 Application No. 08/545,920 A copy of the appealed claims is appended to appellant’s brief. The following references are relied upon by the examiner as evidence of obviousness in support of his rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103: Puckett 2,779,522 Jan. 29, 1957 Buban et al. (Buban) 4,465,208 Aug. 14, 1984 Yablans 5,337,897 Aug. 16, 1994 Claims 1 through 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over “Puckett, Buban et al., or Yablans” (answer page 3). As we understand this statement of the rejections, the examiner relies solely on Puckett in the first rejection, solely on Buban in the second rejection, and solely on Yablans in the third rejection. With regard to each of these rejections, the examiner concedes on page 4 of the answer that the carriers of the applied references lack an entry opening that is similar in size and configuration to a cartridge clip. He also concedes that the applied references lack aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007