Appeal No. 98-0107 Page 5
Application No. 08/545,920
Cir. 1988) and Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837
F.2d 1044, 1052, 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1439 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
See also In re Lalu, 747 F.2d 703, 705, 223 USPQ 1257,
1258 (Fed. Cir. 1984) (The prior art must provide one of
ordinary skill in the art with the motivation to make the
modification needed to arrive at the claimed invention).
The Puckett patent discloses a magazine for receiving
and dispensing individual cartridges or shells, not
cartridge clips as defined in claim 1. Furthermore, the
aperture in Puckett’s panel 7, which corresponds to one of
the claimed edge panels in claim 1, is not sized to
receive and dispense cartridge clips as required by claim
1. The aperture in Puckett’s panel 7 is not even intended
to receive or dispense individual cartridges. Instead,
the individual cartridges are inserted and dispensed
through the side opening 24 bridging the side panel 10 and
the top panel 12. In addition, Puckett lacks a disclosure
of appellant’s claimed inwardly folded flanges.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007