THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES M. ANDERSON, CHARLES A. DUELL,
HENRY M. HUND JR. and DIANE M. HENRY
____________
Appeal No. 98-0516
Application No. 08/400,3281
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 2-7, 10-13, 15-20, 22 and 29, which
1Application for patent filed March 7, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007