Ex parte COLE et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 98-0573                                                           
          Application 08/418,055                                                       


               The provisional rejections of claims 36-42 under the                    
          judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double                       
          patenting over claims 35 and 36 of copending Application                     
          08/417,628 and over claims 36, 37 and 41-45 of copending                     
          Application 08/417,625 are affirmed.  The rejection of claims                
          36-42 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Lilly                 
          is reversed.                                                                 











               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                      
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                     
          § 1.136(a).                                                                  
                                       AFFIRMED                                        







                                           5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007