THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte ROBERT GLASER _____________ Appeal No. 98-0674 Application 08/533,2871 ______________ HEARD: May 6, 1999 _______________ Before MEISTER, PATE and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges. GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. No other claim is pending in the application. Appellant's invention relates to a toothbrush toy having Application for patent filed September 25, 1995.1 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007