Appeal No. 96-0674
Application 08/533,287
view of Schleich and Guest.
Claims 2, 3, 5 and 7 are dependent on claim 1 and,
therefore, contain all of the limitations of claim 1.
Accordingly, the examiner’s respective rejections of
claims 2, 3, 5 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 will not be
sustained.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through
3, 5 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES M. MEISTER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
WILLIAM F. PATE, III ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOHN F. GONZALES )
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007