Appeal No. 98-0978
Application 08/505,650
Kubokawa removes the hardenable material using a cleaner and
solvent. For this reason, Kubokawa, when considered with the
combined teachings of Kanck and Love, cannot add the feature
of an endless web with a low thermal inertia. Thermal inertia
is of no consideration to Kubokawa in that his hardenable
material will be removed by a solvent process.
Similarly, the rejection of claims 10, 11 and 24 as
unpatentable over Kubokawa in view of Love cannot be
sustained. The combined teachings of Kubokawa and Love can in
no manner
teach the low thermal inertia limitation of the independent
claim 10.
For these reasons, the rejections of all claims on
appeal are reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES M. MEISTER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007