Ex parte LETRUDET - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 98-1031                                                                                                                     
                 Application 08/674,667                                                                                                                 



                 and 20 , the only other claims pending in the application,2                                                                                                                           
                 have been objected to as depending from a rejected base claim,                                                                         
                 but indicated as being allowable if rewritten in independent                                                                           
                 form to include all the limitations of the base claim and any                                                                          
                 intervening claims.                                                                                                                    
                                                                The Invention                                                                           
                          Appellant’s invention pertains to a pallet having upper                                                                       
                 and lower members which are configured to be easily and                                                                                
                 quickly connected together with a minimum of operator error                                                                            
                 (specification, page 2).  To this end, the upper and lower                                                                             
                 members are provided with interlocking formations 36, 50 (see                                                                          
                 fig. 2) that provide a “snap” engagement when the members are                                                                          
                 brought together.  Independent claim 1, a copy of which is                                                                             
                 found in the appendix to appellant’s brief, is illustrative of                                                                         
                 the claimed subject matter.                                                                                                            
                                               The Applied Prior Art References                                                                         
                          The references of record relied upon by the examiner in                                                                       

                          2Claim 20 was not separately treated in the final                                                                             
                 rejection, but the examiner on page 5 of the answer expressly                                                                          
                 included it among the claims objected to and allowable if                                                                              
                 rewritten in independent form.                                                                                                         
                                                                         -2-                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007