THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte KOOKAN KIM __________ Appeal No. 98-1042 Application 08/449,0691 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before COHEN, MEISTER, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Kookan Kim originally took this appeal from the final rejection of claims 5 and 21 through 23, all of the claims pending in the application. The examiner has since allowed2 1 Application for patent filed May 24, 1995. 2 Claims 5 and 22 have been amended subsequent to final rejection. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007