Ex parte KIM - Page 1




                                           THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                                
                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                                                    
                     was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                                                                                                       
                     not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                 Paper No. 16                                          

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                               
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                                       Ex parte KOOKAN KIM                                                                                             
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                                        Appeal No. 98-1042                                                                                             
                                                                   Application 08/449,0691                                                                                             
                                                                               ___________                                                                                             
                                                                                  ON BRIEF                                                                                             
                                                                               ___________                                                                                             
                     Before COHEN, MEISTER, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent                                                                                                         
                     Judges.                                                                                                                                                           
                     McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                             

                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             
                                Kookan Kim originally took this appeal from the final                                                                                                  
                     rejection of claims 5 and 21 through 23, all of the claims                                                                                                        
                     pending in the application.   The examiner has since allowed2                                                                                                       

                                1   Application for patent filed May 24, 1995.                                                                                                         
                                2 Claims 5 and 22 have been amended subsequent to final                                                                                                
                     rejection.                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007