Ex parte TAYLOR - Page 2




          Appeal No. 98-1049                                                          
          Application 08/493,463                                                      



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's                  
          final rejection of claims 18 and 19.  Claims 1 through 12                   
          and 14 through 17, which are the only other claims remaining                
          in the application, stand allowed.  Claim 13 has been can-                  
          celed.                                                                      


                    Appellant’s invention relates to a picnic caddy for               
          storing and transporting articles commonly used at a picnic,                
          or at other outdoor or indoor activities.  A copy of independ-              
          ent claims 18 and 19, as reproduced from Appendix A of appel-               
          lant’s brief, is attached to this decision.                                 


                    The prior art references of record relied upon by                 
          the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                          
          Steely et al. (Steely)         2,897,910         Aug. 4, 1959               
          Karoff                         2,926,794         Mar. 1, 1960               
                                                                                     

                    Claims 18 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          103 as being unpatentable over Karoff in view of Steely.                    
          According to the examiner                                                   
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007