Appeal No. 98-1194
Application 08/630,669
that the combined teachings of Eiseman and Casey fail to
establish a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to
the subject matter recited in claim 1 and in claims 7 and 8
which depend therefrom.
Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of these claims.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007