THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KATHIRGAMASUNDARAM SOORIAKUMAR,
ALLEN H. MEITZLER, SHAUN L. MCCARTHY
and RUSSELL J. HAEBERLE
__________
Appeal No. 98-1230
Application 08/316,7531
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 4, 8 and 9. In an Amendment After Final (paper number
6), claim 1 was amended.
The disclosed invention relates to a hermetically sealed
microelectronic device.
1 Application for patent filed October 3, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007