Ex parte SARACENO - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 98-1238                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 08/115,187                                                                                                             

                          We REVERSE and, pursuant to our authority under the                                                                           
                 provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), we will enter new rejections                                                                          
                 of claims 1, 5, 8 and 9.                                                                                                               
                          The appellant's invention pertains to a wire position                                                                         
                 support bracket and to a method of using such a bracket.                                                                               
                 Independent claims 1 and 8 are further illustrative of the                                                                             
                 appealed subject matter and a copy thereof may be found in the                                                                         
                 appendix to the brief.                                                                                                                 
                          The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                                                 
                 Knell                                        2,023,083                                    Dec.  3, 1935                                
                 Huehnel                                      2,867,681                                    Jan.  6, 1959                                
                 Brislin                                      4,345,381                                    Aug. 24, 1982                                
                 Uhrin et al.                                 5,491,902                                    Feb. 20, 19962                               
                 (Uhrin)                                      (filed Aug. 23, 1994)                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                       
                          An additional reference of record relied on by this                                                                           
                 merits panel of the Board is:3                                                                                                         
                 Hubbard                                      4,550,451                                    Nov. 5, 1985                                 







                          2Although not argued by the appellant, this reference                                                                         
                 does not appear to qualify as prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102.                                                                         
                          3This reference was made of record in the Office action                                                                       
                 mailed on November 17, 1993 (Paper No. 4).                                                                                             
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007