Appeal No. 98-1238 Application No. 08/115,187 covering the support structures with wall material, (b) forming an opening in the wall where a wire is located, and (c) passing the wire through the opening formed in the wall material as suggested by Brislin. 7 The appellant argues that Brislin is deficient in that there is no showing therein of forming an opening in the wall material "at the selected aperture" in the support structure. Nevertheless, this reference teaches that the opening in the wall material should be located where the wire has been positioned in the wall. It is the method of Hubbard, as modified by Knell, which provides for the wire to be positioned "at the selected aperture" in support structure. Accordingly, one of ordinary skill in this art following the combined teachings of Hubbard, Knell and Brislin would form the opening in the wall material where the wire has been positioned in the wall (i.e., "at the selected aperture" in support structure). In summary: 7It should be noted that there is no presumption of any definite sequence of method steps unless the claims are so limited as to require it. Ex parte Jackman, 44 USPQ 171, 173 (Bd. App. 1938). 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007