Appeal No. 98-1350 Application No. 08/607,549 claims 16 through 18, 21, 22, 25 and 28 on appeal. Thus, the examiner’s rejection of appellants’ claims 16 through 18, 21, 22, 25 and 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 will not be sustained. In summary: we have not sustained either of the examiner’s rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Thus, the decision of the examiner is reversed. Pursuant to our authority under 37 CFR § 1.196(b), we enter the following new grounds of rejection. Claims 22 through 24 and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by LeVine. More specifically, we direct attention to the embodiment of LeVine seen in Figures 7, 7A, 8 and 9, noting that the blade sharpening apparatus of this embodiment includes (in the language of claim 22 on appeal) a support means (79) for supporting a blade holding assembly, and a blade sharpening member (34, 35, 41 of Fig. 1), wherein the blade holding assembly comprises a first blade holding member having aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007