Ex Parte ROSS et al - Page 8




          Appeal No. 98-1350                                                          
          Application No. 08/607,549                                                  


          Claims 22 and 28 are also rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                 
          as being anticipated by Anthon.  Looking to Figure 8 of Anthon,             
          we note that the blade sharpening apparatus therein includes (in            
          the language of claim 22 on appeal) a support means (70) for                
          supporting a blade holding assembly, and a blade sharpening                 
          member (36 as seen in Figs. 2, 3 and 6), wherein the blade                  
          holding assembly comprises a first blade holding member having a            
          projecting section (20) receivable in an opening (76) in the                
          support means (70) and cooperable with a portion of the support             
          means for detachably securing the first member in supported                 
          relation with the support means; a second blade holding member              
          (12) connected to the first blade holding member (e.g., as in               
          Fig. 6) for pivotal movement relative thereto about a fulcrum               
          point (at screw 14); and means (16) for pivotally displacing one            
          set of ends of the first and second blade holding members about             
          said fulcrum point to cause the opposite set of ends thereof to             
          pivotally displace relative to the fulcrum point for clamping and           
          unclamping a blade (30) disposed between said opposite set of               
          ends of said first and second blade holding members.  As is also            















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007