Ex parte KUSSER - Page 2




          Appeal No. 98-1447                                                          
          Application 08/385,356                                                      


          of a new ground of rejection in the main answer, amendments                 
          were filed and entered such that the status of the claims is                
          as follows.                                                                 


          Claims 32 and 33 stand allowed, and the examiner has indicated              
          that claims 9 through 16 and 24 through 31 are objected to but              
          would be allowable in independent form.  Thus, we have before               
          us                                                                          
          for review on appeal a rejection of claims 1 through 8 and 17               
          through 23.                                                                 


               Appellant’s invention pertains to a base bearing assembly              
          for bearing an upright ornamental object.  An understanding of              
          the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim              
          1, a copy of which appears in APPENDIX B of the reply brief                 
          (Paper No. 15).                                                             

               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the               
          documents listed below:                                                     


          Blizard             2,695,199                     Nov. 23, 1954             

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007