Appeal No. 98-1447
Application 08/385,356
Unterberger 3,537,763 Nov. 3, 1970
The following rejection is before us for review.2
Claims 1 through 8 and 17 through 23 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Unterberger in view
of Blizard.
The full text of the examiner's rejection and response to
the argument presented by appellant appears in the main and
supplemental answers (Paper Nos. 14 and 21), while the
2 It is clear to us that the inclusion of the rejection of claims 8 through 16
and 23 through 31 under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, in the answer was inadvertent
since this rejection was indicated to have been overcome and obviously withdrawn (Paper
No. 10). Further, it is noted that the new ground of rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112,
second paragraph, appearing on page 6 of the main answer, was overcome as specified on
page 2 of the supplemental answer (Paper No. 21).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007