Ex parte BSCHORR et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1998-1452                                                        
          Application 08/408,006                                                      


               Lynch discloses a “resilient sealing trim or weather                   
          strip having a longitudinally extending flexible tube [hollow               
          rubber sealing portion 12] with portions of its length                      
          containing a resilient filler [elastomeric foamed-in-place                  
          resin 27] serving to prevent crimping or transverse collapsing              
          of the tube when it is curved on a relatively short radius”                 
          (column 1, lines 14 through 18).                                            
               As indicated above, appealed claim 1 recites an                        
          arrangement for avoiding squeaking noises generated by a                    
          window pane being                                                           




          displaced relative to a sealing element wherein a vibration                 
          damping element provides an additional modal damping                        
          satisfying a specific mathematically-defined inequality.                    
          Nozaki and Lynch are completely devoid of any teaching or                   
          suggestion of this vibration damping element inequality.                    
          Indeed, neither of these references exhibits any concern                    
          whatsoever with the problem of sealing element/window pane                  
          vibration.  Rejections based on 35 U.S.C.    § 103 must rest                
          on a factual basis.  In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017, 154                 
                                         -5-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007