Appeal No. 1998-1452 Application 08/408,006 Lynch discloses a “resilient sealing trim or weather strip having a longitudinally extending flexible tube [hollow rubber sealing portion 12] with portions of its length containing a resilient filler [elastomeric foamed-in-place resin 27] serving to prevent crimping or transverse collapsing of the tube when it is curved on a relatively short radius” (column 1, lines 14 through 18). As indicated above, appealed claim 1 recites an arrangement for avoiding squeaking noises generated by a window pane being displaced relative to a sealing element wherein a vibration damping element provides an additional modal damping satisfying a specific mathematically-defined inequality. Nozaki and Lynch are completely devoid of any teaching or suggestion of this vibration damping element inequality. Indeed, neither of these references exhibits any concern whatsoever with the problem of sealing element/window pane vibration. Rejections based on 35 U.S.C. § 103 must rest on a factual basis. In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017, 154 -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007