Ex parte VALIULIS et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 98-1459                                         Page 6           
          Application No. 08/309,756                                                  


          arm having a downwardly facing snap clip and finger so that                 
          upon downward movement of the divider arm the snap clip and                 
          finger of the divider arm engages the pair of upwardly opening              
          channels or clips of the rail.  It is our opinion that these                
          limitations are not suggested by the applied prior art.  In                 
          that regard, while Breslow does disclose a shelf divider                    
          having an elongated rail (15) having a pair of channels (24                 
          and 26) and an elongated divider arm (35) having branches (40               
          and 42) which snap-fit into the channels (24 and 26), Breslow               
          does not teach or suggest an elongated rail having a pair of                
          upwardly opening channels and an elongated divider arm having               
          a downwardly facing snap clip and finger so that upon downward              
          movement of the divider arm the snap clip and finger of the                 
          divider arm engages the pair of upwardly opening channels or                
          clips of the rail.  To supply these omissions in the teachings              
          of Breslow, the examiner made determinations (answer, pages 3-              
          4) that these difference would have been obvious to an artisan              
          based upon the teachings of Gold.  However, it is our view                  
          that this determination of the examiner has not been supported              










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007