THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID C. IRVING
____________
Appeal No. 98-1460
Application No. 08/615,8201
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 19, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed March 14, 1996.
2Claims 17 and 18 were amended subsequent to the final
rejection resulting in the sub silentio withdrawal of the
rejection of claims 17 and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, which was made in the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007