Ex parte COLE et al. - Page 2




             Appeal No. 98-1486                                                                                   
             Application 08/417,628                                                                               


                    This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of                                      
             claims 35 and 36, which are all of the claims remaining in the                                       
             application.                                                                                         
                                                THE INVENTION                                                     
                    Appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward solid                                        
             pharmaceutically acceptable salts of clavulanic acid.                                                
             Appellants state that salts of clavulanic acid enhance the                                           
             effectiveness of $-lactam antibiotics against many $-lactamase                                       
             producing bacteria (specification, page 1, lines 5-7).  Claim                                        
             35 is illustrative and reads as follows:                                                             
                    35. A solid pharmaceutically acceptable salt of                                               
             clavulanic acid.                                                                                     
                                                THE REFERENCE                                                     
             Eli Lilly & Co. (Lilly)          1,315,177          Apr. 26,                                         
             1973                                                                                                 
                                               THE REJECTIONS                                                     
                    Claims 35 and 36 stand provisionally rejected under the                                       
             judicially-created doctrine of obviousness-type double                                               
             patenting over claims 37 and 41 of copending Application                                             
             08/418,055 and over claims 36, 37 and 41-45 of copending                                             


                                                       -2-2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007