Ex parte KUROKI et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 98-1529                                                                                       Page 2                        
                 Application No. 08/446,375                                                                                                             


                          This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner                                                                           
                 finally rejecting claims 6-11 and 17,  which constitute all of     2                                                                   
                 the claims remaining of record in the application.                                                                                     
                          The appellants’ invention is directed to a method for                                                                         
                 manufacturing an enclosed hard disk drive.  The claims on                                                                              
                 appeal have been reproduced in an appendix to the Brief.                                                                               


                                                                THE REFERENCES                                                                          
                          The references relied upon by the examiner to support the                                                                     
                 final rejection are:                                                                                                                   
                 Takahashi et al. (Takahashi)                                            5,108,812                           Apr.                       
                 28, 1992                                                                                                                               
                 Japanese Patent Publication                                    64-4996                    Jan. 10, 1989                                
                 (Yamaguchi)                                                                                                                            

                                                                THE REJECTIONS                                                                          
                          Claim 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                                                                         
                 paragraph, as containing subject matter which was not described                                                                        
                 in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to                                                                          
                 one skilled in the relevant art that the inventors, at the time                                                                        
                 the application was filed, had possession of the claimed                                                                               
                 invention.                                                                                                                             


                          2An amendment to claim 6 was after the final rejection                                                                        
                 was entered by the examiner, but it failed to overcome any of                                                                          
                 the rejections.                                                                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007