Appeal No. 98-1530
Application No. 08/492,590
claims of record in the application. However, the examiner
has indicated in the Answer that claims 11-13 and 19 would be
allowable if rewritten in independent form. Therefore, claims
1-10 and 14-18 remain before us on appeal.
The appellants’ invention is directed to an improvement
to an aerial apparatus comprising a sheave and means for
measuring the components of a load applied to the sheave. The
subject matter before us on appeal is illustrated by reference
to claim 1, which has been reproduced in an appendix to the
Brief.
THE REFERENCES
The references relied upon by the examiner to support the
final rejection are:
Habern et al. 3,330,154 Jul. 11, 1967
(Habern)
Rigney et al. 3,826,321 Jul. 30, 1974
(Rigney)
Kovács 4,566,341 Jan. 28, 1986
Schenck 1 067 230 2 Oct. 15, 1959
(German)
2PTO translation attached.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007