THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID BROGER and HEINZ CLEMENT
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1562
Application No. 08/611,4161
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 6, 8 and 16 to 22. Claims 7 and 9 to
15 have been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR §
1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
1Application for patent filed March 5, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007