Appeal No. 1998-1562 Page 2 Application No. 08/611,416 BACKGROUND The appellants' invention relates to an apparatus for changing a lap. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in the appendix to the appellants' brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Smith 4,005,830 Feb. 1, 1977 Johannsson 4,298,173 Nov. 3, 1981 Eichenberger et al. 5,096,135 Mar. 17, 1992 (Eichenberger) Claim 20 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the appellants regard as the invention. Claims 1, 16 to 18 and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Eichenberger.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007