THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte GREGORY K. WILLIAMS and SEAN A. BRADY
__________
Appeal No. 1998-1647
Application 08/668,5031
___________
HEARD: December 7, 1999
___________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 25-28, 30, 31, 33, 34, 44 and 45. Claims
1Application for patent filed July 2, 1996. According to
appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
08/252,125, filed June 1, 1994, now abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application 08/050,942, filed April 21, 1993,
now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007