Ex parte MURPHY - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                      
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     
                                                                                                                    Paper No. 16                        
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Ex parte PAUL MURPHY                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1998-1773                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/609,3031                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,                                                                                 
                 ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                         
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 25 through 50, which are all of the claims                                                                         
                 pending in this application.2                                                                                                          




                          1Application for patent filed March 1, 1996.                                                                                  
                          2Claim 27 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.                                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007