Appeal No. 1998-1773 Page 3
Application No. 08/609,303
BACKGROUND
The appellant's invention relates to a system for
terminating the shield of a high speed cable. An
understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading
of exemplary claims 25, 31, 37 and 44 (the independent claims
on appeal), which appear in the appendix to the appellant's
brief.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Schantz 3,916,139 Oct. 28,
1975
Dohi 4,966,565 Oct.
30, 1990
Brunker et al. 5,304,069 Apr.
19, 1994
(Brunker)
Claims 25, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 37, 39 to 42, 44 and 46 to
49 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Brunker in view of Schantz.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007