THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte HANS MULLER
________________
Appeal No. 1998-1868
Application 08/514,3771
________________
HEARD: NOVEMBER 15, 1999
________________
Before STAAB, McQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Hans Muller appeals from the final rejection of claims 1,
6, 30 and 31. Claims 2 through 5 and 7 through 29, the only2
1Application for patent filed August 11, 1995.
2The appellant amended claims 1, 6 and 31 subsequent to
final rejection via the paper (Paper No. 19) filed with the
reply brief (Paper No. 18) on March 19, 1998 . Although the
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007