Ex parte MULLER - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1868                                                        
          Application 08/514,377                                                      


          other claims pending in the application, stand withdrawn from               
          consideration pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b).  We reverse.                   
               The subject matter on appeal relates to “a method and                  
          apparatus for trimming flat products along a predetermined                  
          cutting line” (specification, page 2).  Claims 1 and 6 are                  
          illustrative and read as follows:                                           
               1.   A method for trimming flat printed products along a               
          predetermined cutting line, comprising the steps of:                        
               continuously feeding the printed products in succession                
          in a feed direction parallel to a plane defined by the printed              
          products;                                                                   
               passing the printed products between two superposed                    
          knives having oppositely disposed cutting edges; and                        
               moving the two knives in cutting engagement with one                   
          another in a direction that includes a component perpendicular              
          to the plane of the printed products and a movement component               
          that is in the feed direction so that a continuous feed flow                
          of the printed products is maintained during the trimming.                  
               6.   An apparatus for trimming flat printed products                   
          along a predetermined cutting line, comprising:                             
               conveyor means for continuously feeding the printed                    
          products in succession in a feed direction parallel to a plane              
          defined by the printed products;                                            

          examiner did not mention the amendments in the advisory letter              
          (Paper No. 21) acknowledging receipt and entry of the reply                 
          brief, he did place a dated and initialed instruction to                    
          “Enter” in the page margin adjacent the amendments (which have              
          in fact been clerically inserted into the record).                          
                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007