Ex parte BARRON - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1919                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/620,993                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to a fish-attracting                 
          system (claims 1 through 10), a fishing lure (claims 11                     
          through 28) and a fish-attracting or repelling device (claims               
          29 through 40).  An understanding of the invention can be                   
          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is                       
          reproduced in the opinion section below.                                    


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Smith                    2,784,399                     March 5,             
          1957                                                                        
          Ursrey et al.                 4,227,331                     Oct.            
          14, 1980                                                                    
          (Ursrey)                                                                    



               Claims 1, 2, 5-11, 15, 24, 25, 27-29 and 40 stand                      
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Ursrey.                 


               Claims 3, 4, 16-23 and 33-39 stand rejected under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Ursrey.                             










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007