Appeal No. 1998-1919 Page 2 Application No. 08/620,993 BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to a fish-attracting system (claims 1 through 10), a fishing lure (claims 11 through 28) and a fish-attracting or repelling device (claims 29 through 40). An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced in the opinion section below. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Smith 2,784,399 March 5, 1957 Ursrey et al. 4,227,331 Oct. 14, 1980 (Ursrey) Claims 1, 2, 5-11, 15, 24, 25, 27-29 and 40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Ursrey. Claims 3, 4, 16-23 and 33-39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Ursrey.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007