Appeal No. 1998-1919 Page 7
Application No. 08/620,993
is our view that claimed transducer provided in a second
container "reads on" the LED light source D of Ursrey.
1
Since all the limitations of claim 1 are found in Ursrey,
the decision of the examiner to reject claim 1 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) is affirmed.
Claims 2, 5-8, 11, 15, 24, 25, 27-29 and 40
The appellant has grouped claims 1, 2, 5-8, 11, 15, 24,
25, 27-29 and 40 as standing or falling together. Thereby, 3
in accordance with 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7), claims 2, 5-8, 11,
15, 24, 25, 27-29 and 40 fall with claim 1. Thus, it follows
that the decision of the examiner to reject claims 2, 5-8, 11,
15, 24, 25, 27-29 and 40 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is also
affirmed.
Claims 9 and 10
Claim 9 reads as follows:
An improvement according to Claim 8, including a
replacement transducer container constructed and arranged
3See page 2 of the appellant's brief.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007