THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte TATEO MURAMATSU
________________
Appeal No. 98-2082
Application 08/521,6261
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 2, 4, 8, 9, 11, 14, 16 and 18-24. Claims
1Application for patent filed August 31, 1995.
According to appellant, the application is a continuation-in-
part of Application 08/435,433, filed May 10, 1995, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007