Ex parte MIKELIONIS et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 98-2123                                                          
          Application No. 08/326,669                                                  


               We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                     
               The appellants' invention pertains to a wallet card                    
          having a sleeve adapted to removably receive an elongated                   
          function member such as a medical test strip or thermometer                 
          strip.  Independent claims 1 and 32 are further illustrative                
          of the appealed subject matter and copies thereof may be found              
          in the APPENDIX to the brief.                                               
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Cohan                    3,792,542                     Feb. 19,             
          1974                                                                        
          Gee, Sr. (Gee)                3,958,690                     May             
          25, 1976                                                                    
          Palti                    4,588,307                     May  13,             
          1986                                                                        
          Grover                   4,619,469                     Oct. 28,             
          1986                                                                        

               The claims on appeal stand rejected in the following                   
          manner:                                                                     
               (1) Claims 1-4, 8-11, 13-16, 18-23 and 27-30 under 35                  
          U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Grover;                             
               (2) Claims 1-4, 8-15, 17-22 and 27-32 under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Gee;                                       
               (3) Claim 33 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                         
          unpatentable over Cohan in view of Grover; and                              
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007