Ex parte FARGES - Page 2




                Appeal No. 1998-2356                                                                                                      
                Application 08/373,860                                                                                                    


                        Appellant's invention relates to a lighter than air balloon containing a lighting device.                         

                Independent claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of that claim, as                        

                reproduced from the Appendix to appellant’s brief, is attached to this decision.                                          



                        The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims                   

                are:                                                                                                                      

                Martin                                          2,619,303                        Nov. 25, 1952                            
                Mack                                            3,546,944                        Dec.  15, 1970                           
                Moran                                           3,745,677                        July   17, 1973                          
                Goddard                                         3,839,631                        Oct.     1, 1974                         
                Rosenblatt et al. (Rosenblatt)                  4,262,529                        Apr.   21, 1981                          
                Stockton                                        4,810,223                        Mar.     7, 1989                         


                        Claims 1 through 4, 7 and 9 through 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                              

                unpatentable over Goddard in view of Stockton.                                                                            



                        Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Goddard in view of                       

                Stockton as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Mack and Rosenblatt.                                         



                        Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Goddard in view of                       

                Stockton as applied to claims 1 and 4 above, and further in view of Moran.                                                


                                                                    2                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007