Ex parte FOGLE - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                          
                          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                            
                          journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                                               
                          Board.                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                Paper No. 20                            

                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                  Ex parte HOMER W. FOGLE, Jr.                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 98-2398                                                                           
                                                    Application No. 08/815,2511                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                 ____________                                                                           

                 Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent                                                                            
                 Judges.                                                                                                                                
                 FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                


                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                 This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                                 
                 rejection of claims 1 through 3, 11 through 13 and 16, which                                                                           



                          1Application for patent filed March 12, 1997.                                                                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007