THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN G. STARK, RICHARD G. LUND
CECIL H. NELSON and BRYNN D. ROGERS
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-2768
Application No. 08/520,8021
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
1Application for patent filed August 30, 1995. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application No. 08/298,591,
filed August 31, 1994, now U.S. Patent 5,484,389, issued January 16, 1996,
which is a continuation of Application No. 07/733,207, filed July 19, 1991,
now U.S. Patent 5,368,546, issued November 29, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007