THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte THOMAS H. ROESSLER, PAUL T. VAN GOMPEL,
DANIEL R. SCHLINZ, MARK G. HEATH
and GEOFFREY W. FROST
__________
Appeal No. 98-2787
Application 08/554,6401
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 20, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
1 Application for patent filed November 6, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007