Appeal No. 1998-2941 Page 20 Application No. 08/061,985 Reexamination Control No. 90/003,682 For the reasons stated above, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is affirmed. Claims 25-28, 33-35, 46/20, and 46/28 The appellants have grouped claims 20, 25-28, 33-35, 46/20, and 46/28 as standing or falling together. Thereby, 9 in accordance with 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7), claims 25-28, 33-35, 46/20, and 46/28 fall with claim 20. Thus, it follows that the decision of the examiner to reject claims 25-28, 33-35, 46/20, and 46/28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is also affirmed. Rejection (5) We sustain the rejection of claims 20, 22, 23, 25-28, 30, 31, 33-35, 46/20, and 46/28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by either one of the News & Observer article or the PSA abstract. Claim 20 9See page 8 of the appellants' brief.Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007